wmacgyver at gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 11:02:25 EDT 2010
Yes, it's only for the keys that the node is responsible for.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Tony Novak <tony at dapper.net> wrote:
> Quick question about Riak's memory footprint: I know that Bitcask
> requires all keys to fit in memory. Does this mean only the keys that
> reside on a given node, or does each node hold the keys of the entire
> system? I assume it's the former, but I just want to be sure.
> Basically what I'm trying to figure out is whether we should expect
> better performance from a cluster of N nodes with 2*M GB of memory
> each, or 2*N nodes with M GB each.
More information about the riak-users