jlangevin at loomlearning.com
Thu Aug 4 11:12:35 EDT 2011
Ahh, that's a good question, anyone have any feedback on using this method
for adding new nodes to a cluster, as opposed to letting Riak sync up a
newly added node?*
Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlangevin at loomlearning.com -
www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/1/2011 3:05 AM, Fyodor Yarochkin wrote:
>> I'm setting up a brand-new staging server, with Riak 0.14.2.
>>> As I want to get all production data, I thought I could scp the data
>>> directory into the new one (besides the ring dir).
>> What I normally do in this case is 'riak-admin backup .. and
>> riak-admin restore from that file. works like a charm. and you can
>> selectively backup/restore a node, or a the whole cluster.
> Assuming the nodes are well-connected, does this work better than adding a
> new node, letting data migrate there, then removing the old one?
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell at gmail.com
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users