NoSQL combinations - what works best?

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 13:23:32 EDT 2011


On 8/9/2011 12:08 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote:
>
> Outside of legacy concerns I have no idea why someone would select
> memcache over redis for a new application today. Redis gives you
> everything memcache does plus a boat load of
> omg-wtf-where-has-this-been-all-my-life capabilities.

The main point of memcache is that it is distributed and the clients 
automatically handle failover at any reasonably large scale.  How do you 
arrange that with redis?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com





More information about the riak-users mailing list