Python client performance issue
nico.meyer at adition.com
Tue Feb 15 04:46:53 EST 2011
perhaps you can try to upgrade the protocol buffers library to at least
version 2.3.0. This is from the changelog for that version:
* 10-25 times faster than 2.2.0, still pure-Python.
Am Montag, den 14.02.2011, 19:35 -0500 schrieb Mike Stoddart:
> Will do when I get time. Would the REST API be any faster?
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Thomas Burdick
> <tburdick at wrightwoodtech.com> wrote:
> > I would highly recommend looking in to the cProfile and pstat module and
> > profile the code that is going slow. If your using the protocol buffer
> > client it could possibly be related to the fact that python protocol buffers
> > is extraordinarily slow and is well known to be slow. Profile until proven
> > guilty though.
> > Tom Burdick
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Mike Stoddart <stodge at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I added some code to my system to test writing data into Riak. I'm
> >> using the Python client library with protocol buffers. I'm writing a
> >> snapshot of my current data, which is one json object containing on
> >> average 60 individual json sub-objects. Each sub object contains about
> >> 22 values.
> >> # Archived entry. ts is a formatted timestamp.
> >> entry = self._bucket.new(ts, data=data)
> >> entry.store()
> >> # Now write the current entry.
> >> entry = self._bucket.new("current", data=data)
> >> entry.store()
> >> I'm writing the same data twice; the archived copy and the current
> >> copy, which I can easily retrieve later. Performance is lower than
> >> expected; top is showing a constant cpu usage of 10-12%.
> >> I haven't decided to use Riak; this is to help me decide. But for now
> >> are there any optimisations I can do here? A similiar test with
> >> MongoDB shows a steady cpu usage of 1%. The cpu usages are for my
> >> client, not Riak's own processes. The only differences in my test app
> >> is the code that writes the data to the database. Otherwise all other
> >> code is 100% the same between these two test apps.
> >> Any suggestions appreciated.
> >> Thanks
> >> Mike
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> riak-users mailing list
> >> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
More information about the riak-users