Memory usage

Jeremiah Peschka jeremiah.peschka at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 20:32:46 EST 2011


I'm not sure. I think it would depend on the number of JavaScript MR engines you have running, the operations you're performing, and the amount of data that is being read into memory.

-- 
Jeremiah Peschka
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
MCITP: Database Developer, DBA
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: 
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 04:44:58PM -0800, Jeremiah Peschka wrote:
> > You'll be constrained in the number of keys that you can store (using the bitcask backend). There's a good spreadsheet for capacity planning: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ak4OBkABJPsxdEowYXc2akxnYU9xNkJmbmZscnhaTFE&hl=en&authkey=CMHw8tYO
> 
> The storage seems sufficient for me.
> 
> > I don't know how well Riak would behave otherwise in an environment that tight. I'd think you'd be limited to single key lookups, but I have been wrong before.
> 
> So you think it might not be possible to run map-reduce functions?
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias-Christian
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20110215/e3a557b2/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list