siculars at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 11:53:35 EDT 2011
Ya, my original message just highlighted the standard 0,1,5 that most
people/hardware should know/be able to support. There are better
options and 10 would be one of them.
@siculars on twitter
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:43, Ryan Zezeski <rzezeski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sicular <siculars at gmail.com
> > wrote:
> Save your ops dudes the headache and just use raid 5 and be done
> with it.
> Depending on the number of disks available I might even argue
> running software RAID 10 for better throughput and less chance of
> data loss (as long as you can afford to cut your avail storage in
> half on every machine). It's not too hard to setup on modern Linux
> distros (mdadm); at least I was doing it 5 years ago and I'm no sys
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users