Multiple disks

Alexander Sicular siculars at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 11:53:35 EDT 2011


Ya, my original message just highlighted the standard 0,1,5 that most  
people/hardware should know/be able to support. There are better  
options and 10 would be one of them.


@siculars on twitter
http://siculars.posterous.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:43, Ryan Zezeski <rzezeski at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sicular <siculars at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>  Save your ops dudes the headache and just use raid 5 and be done  
> with it.
>
>
> Depending on the number of disks available I might even argue  
> running software RAID 10 for better throughput and less chance of  
> data loss (as long as you can afford to cut your avail storage in  
> half on every machine).  It's not too hard to setup on modern Linux  
> distros (mdadm); at least I was doing it 5 years ago and I'm no sys  
> admin.
>
> -Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20110322/f621a560/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list