Java client API

Russell Brown russell.brown at me.com
Thu Mar 24 04:12:02 EDT 2011


On 24 Mar 2011, at 06:07, Wilson MacGyver wrote:

> On Mar 23, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Jon Brisbin <jon at jbrisbin.com> wrote:
> 
>> I personally don't like using ambiguous short names. I get that you can technically distinguish things by package name but using a simple name that is very common isn't good for code readability. "RiakEntry" is unambiguous, self-documenting, and semantically correct. "Entry" would, in my mind, represent a very generic interface that defined various kinds of "Entry"s of things.
>> 
> 
> Likewise, I'd like to suggest RiakDoc

I can see why but I think that might be too specific, not every entry in riak is a document (but every document in riak is an entry.)

> _______________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com





More information about the riak-users mailing list