Java client API
russell.brown at me.com
Thu Mar 24 11:43:50 EDT 2011
On 24 Mar 2011, at 14:15, Sean Cribbs wrote:
>>> Likewise, I'd like to suggest RiakDoc
>> I can see why but I think that might be too specific, not every entry in riak is a document (but every document in riak is an entry.)
> I understand the desire to have a better name for what you're storing in Riak (I went down that road myself in the Ruby client for a while), but for consistency's sake it makes most sense to use "object" over "entry" or "doc". Using something else just invites confusion when someone reads the wiki and other documentation and then tries to apply what they learned to a specific language driver.
Oh yeah. I had not even considered that. A strong enough reason to settle it (for me at least.)
> That said, there's no reason you can't build abstractions over the top of the object that are documents, entries, blobs, etc.
> "RObject" is the class name the Ruby client uses, for what it's worth.
> Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com>
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
More information about the riak-users