Java client API
hec0101 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 24 16:51:01 EDT 2011
Really cool to see general thoughts on java driver. Non related: +1 Jetty driver
- pretty granular api behavior plus intuitive interface. Also Stringtree offers
a flawless mapping of hashmap - json and seems pretty flexible.
From: Russell Brown <russell.brown at me.com>
To: Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com>
Cc: riak-users at lists.basho.com
Sent: Thu, 24 March, 2011 15:43:50
Subject: Re: Java client API
On 24 Mar 2011, at 14:15, Sean Cribbs wrote:
>>> Likewise, I'd like to suggest RiakDoc
>> I can see why but I think that might be too specific, not every entry in riak
>>is a document (but every document in riak is an entry.)
> I understand the desire to have a better name for what you're storing in Riak
>(I went down that road myself in the Ruby client for a while), but for
>consistency's sake it makes most sense to use "object" over "entry" or "doc".
>Using something else just invites confusion when someone reads the wiki and
>other documentation and then tries to apply what they learned to a specific
Oh yeah. I had not even considered that. A strong enough reason to settle it
(for me at least.)
> That said, there's no reason you can't build abstractions over the top of the
>object that are documents, entries, blobs, etc.
> "RObject" is the class name the Ruby client uses, for what it's worth.
> Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com>
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
riak-users mailing list
riak-users at lists.basho.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users