Riak doesn't use consistent hashing.
grourk at dropcam.com
Thu May 26 14:31:20 EDT 2011
Excellent. Let me know what I can do to help.
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Justin Sheehy wrote:
> Hi, Greg.
> Thanks for your thoughtful analysis and the pull request.
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Greg Nelson <grourk at dropcam.com> wrote:
> > However, the skipping bit isn't part of
> > Riak's preflist calculation. Instead, nodes claim partitions in such a way
> > as to be spaced out by target_n_val, to obviate the need for skipping.
> A fun bit of history here: once upon a time, Riak's claiming worked in
> the same way as described by Amazon, with "skipping" and all. We
> noticed that this approach caused a different set of operational
> difficulties when hinted handoff due to node outages was occurring at
> the same time as a membership change. That prompted changes to the
> claim algorithm, which we still consider an area deserving of active
> Multiple people will be reading, analyzing, and testing your work to
> contribute to this improvement. We very much appreciate your efforts,
> and want to make sure that we incorporate them in the best possible
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users