2i for single-result lookup

Kresten Krab Thorup krab at trifork.com
Tue Nov 8 07:43:14 EST 2011

Or for something simple like this you can also use my riak_link_index module



On Nov 8, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Greg Pascale wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm thinking about using 2i for a certain piece of my system, but I'm worried that the document-based partitioning may make it suboptimal.
> The issue is that the secondary fields I want to query over (email and username) are unique, so each will only ever map to one value. Since 2i queries a coverage set, but I'm only ever looking for one result, it's going to be hitting n-1 machines needlessly.
> So, what I'm looking to understand is how much overhead a single-result 2i lookup like this will incur vs. a primary-key lookup, or even vs. search. Search doesn't intuitively feel like the right tool here, but I wonder if it may actually be preferable since it uses term-based partitioning.
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Greg
> Clipboard
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

More information about the riak-users mailing list