Secondary Indexes - Feedback?

Jim Adler jim.adler at comcast.net
Thu Nov 17 00:59:14 EST 2011


Speed.  I'm running 6 nodes on EC2 with load balancing and instance storage.
I'm seeing an average of 115 ms per index.run() using a single _bin index,
protocol buffers, and python client.  A regular get() is about 40 ms.  How
can I get faster access with 2i?

Jim

From:  Rusty Klophaus <rusty at basho.com>
Date:  Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:57:48 -0500
To:  "riak-users at lists.basho.com" <riak-users at lists.basho.com>
Subject:  Secondary Indexes - Feedback?

Hello Riak Users,

The Basho team recently released Riak 1.0 which introduced a new
feature called Secondary Indexes. This feature allows you to tag Riak
objects with additional metadata, and then later query the indexed
metadata to retrieve the objects.

(See http://wiki.basho.com/Secondary-Indexes.html)

Now that you've had a few weeks to investigate and experiment with
Secondary Indexes, I'm hoping to hear about your experiences to help
us focus future development efforts most effectively:
* Have you tried Secondary Indexes?
* Does the feature help solve your problems? If not, why not? Any concerns?
* What is your wish list for the future of Secondary Indexes?
Please feel free to respond either publicly or privately to this
email, and thanks for your help!

Best,
Rusty

-- 
Rusty Klophaus (@rustyio)
Basho Technologies, Inc.
www.basho.com <http://www.basho.com/>


_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list
riak-users at lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20111116/4f84178c/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list