Riak Adoption - What can we do better?

Anthony Molinaro anthonym at alumni.caltech.edu
Sat Apr 21 11:42:45 EDT 2012

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:20:15PM -0500, Paul Gross wrote:
> 4. Add the concept of ordering (without having to fall back to
> map/reduce). It's difficult to do paging without ordering, and most
> webapps require it. In general, paging in RIak is hard, since
> there's no concept of a range of results from a secondary index.

I thought there were range queries for secondary indices


I don't think that it guarantees ordering but you can grab a range.


Anthony Molinaro                           <anthonym at alumni.caltech.edu>

More information about the riak-users mailing list