Riak Adoption - What can we do better?

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Sat Apr 21 17:25:29 EDT 2012

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Gideon de Kok <gideondk at me.com> wrote:
> Op zaterdag 21 april 2012, om 19:50 heeft Les Mikesell het volgende
> geschreven:
> Is there 'something like redis' that doesn't introduce a single point
> of failure? And a completely different set of administrative
> concepts?
> A different, Riak only, approach is to safe the sorted keys in a Riak
> object:
> - You could have a sorted list of keys in a array in a user object for
> instance.

That seems to assume that a single client has all the keys at once.
What if your clients and the data sources are distributed as well?
And if that could work reliably from a set of clients, why can't the
server side do it?

   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell at gmail.com

More information about the riak-users mailing list