Riak Adoption - What can we do better?

Mark Phillips mark at basho.com
Mon Apr 23 13:33:28 EDT 2012


Update: I'm working on rolling this thread into a blog post with a summary
of all these suggestions and what we're doing to address them in the short
and long term. This will be out today with any luck.

Thanks for this. Never have I been so excited by people pointing out our
shortcomings. :)

Mark


On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Gideon de Kok <gideondk at me.com> wrote:
> > Op zaterdag 21 april 2012, om 19:50 heeft Les Mikesell het volgende
> > geschreven:
> >
> > Is there 'something like redis' that doesn't introduce a single point
> > of failure? And a completely different set of administrative
> > concepts?
> >
> > A different, Riak only, approach is to safe the sorted keys in a Riak
> > object:
> > - You could have a sorted list of keys in a array in a user object for
> > instance.
>
> That seems to assume that a single client has all the keys at once.
> What if your clients and the data sources are distributed as well?
> And if that could work reliably from a set of clients, why can't the
> server side do it?
>
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>     lesmikesell at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20120423/c578a703/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list