riak_core app using riak_kv

Adam Schepis adam.schepis at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 07:27:59 EST 2012


Mihai,

thanks for the advice, I really like your suggestion.  Do you have any data
regarding the performance trade off you are making by using the erlang
protobuf api instead of riak:local_client?

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Mihai Balea <mihai at hates.ms> wrote:

> Adam,
>
> We are also using local_client to run a riak_core app together with
> riak_kv in the same cluster.
> Unless you have compelling reasons to do go this route, it might be better
> to split the two into separate clusters. You gain a lot of flexibility from
> an operational point of view, with the ability to spec and manage the two
> separately.
> Not knowing details of your application, I cannot really comment any
> further, but I thought I'd bring this to your attention.
>
> Mihai
>
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:59 AM, Adam Schepis wrote:
>
> Thank Ryan!
>
> There's a funny side-effect with posting on a user list or going to ask
> somebody for help with something where as soon as you do it, you find the
> answer you were looking for :)  I found riak:local_client() shortly after I
> posted and it's working like a charm.
>
> thanks again!
> Adam
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ryan Zezeski <rzezeski at basho.com> wrote:
>
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20120307/49cc220a/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list