Is Riak suitable for s small-record write-intensive billion-records application?
yassen.tis at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 02:10:32 EDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012, Yassen Damyanov <yassen.tis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Whatever the solution, it needs to be symmetric, that is, all
> nodes must be equivalent.
With "symmetric" I mean more "interchangable" than "functionally
equal". That is,
if a node plays a central role and goes down, the system should be
able to pick a new "master" on its own and any other node should be
able to become such.
Guys, your input is MUCH appreciated. Thank you!
More information about the riak-users