Comparison against DynamoDB
hector at basho.com
Sun Apr 7 22:32:14 EDT 2013
>From past experience, DynamoDB costs are driven primarily by desired
request capacity (per table). If you're interested in a technical
comparison between DynamoDB and Riak, see the comparisons section 
on our docs site.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Evan Vigil-McClanahan
<emcclanahan at basho.com> wrote:
> I can't speak to the costing issues, as that isn't something I am
> terribly familiar with, but at the moment, riak still has some
> overhead issues with very small values. There are upcoming
> optimizations in the next major (1.4) release that should help. What
> issues did you run into?
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, David Koblas <david at koblas.com> wrote:
>> Spent some time with the AWS folks the other day and was getting sold on
>> using DynamoDB for some of our large Key Value store needs. However given
>> the read/write economics of DynamoDB vs. Instance+Storage costs on Riak I
>> was wondering if anybody has done a good thinking around where the cost
>> inflections points are?
>> Also before I go and benchmark things how does Riak perform with 2B entries
>> which are < 1K in size, when I last did the benchmarks - just before 1.0 -
>> there were a few issues.
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
More information about the riak-users