Atomicity of if_not_modified?

Kaspar Thommen kaspar.thommen at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 11:44:42 EST 2013


Hi,

Can someone confirm this? If it's true, what exactly is the purpose of
offering the if_not_modified flag?

Kaspar
On Dec 28, 2012 1:51 PM, "Daniil Churikov" <ddosia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Riak doesn't have atomic updates. This if_not_modified does not gives you
> any
> guaranties. Best way to handle with simultaneously updates is try to
> engineer scheme so that only one client makes concurrent updates and in
> case
> of conflict any sibling will be good for you. Another option is try to use
> convergent data types [0][1]
> [0] https://github.com/basho/riak_dt
> [1] https://github.com/mochi/statebox_riak
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Atomicity-of-if-not-modified-tp4026430p4026431.html
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20130103/ee856a9b/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list