riak_kv_memory_backend in production
david.yu.ftw at gmail.com
Thu Jul 18 14:43:35 EDT 2013
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, kpandey <kumar.pandey at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there known production installation of riak that uses
Btw, another alternative is to use the leveldb memory-backend impl
(prevents gc/storage overhead from erlang tables). You'll have to patch up
basho's fork of leveldb and include/compile/enable the memory-backend impl
from stock leveldb.
> We have a need to store transient data just in
> memory ( never hitting persistent store). I'm testing riak on aws with 3
> node cluster and looks good so far. Just wanted to find out what kind of
> setup people are using in production.
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
When the cat is away, the mouse is alone.
- David Yu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users