riak_kv_memory_backend in production

David Yu david.yu.ftw at gmail.com
Thu Jul 18 14:43:35 EDT 2013

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, kpandey <kumar.pandey at gmail.com> wrote:

> Are there known production installation of riak that uses
> riak_kv_memory_backend.

Btw, another alternative is to use the leveldb memory-backend impl
(prevents gc/storage overhead from erlang tables).  You'll have to patch up
basho's fork of leveldb and include/compile/enable the memory-backend impl
from stock leveldb.

> We have a need to store transient data just in
> memory ( never hitting persistent store). I'm testing riak on aws with 3
> node cluster and looks good so far.   Just wanted to find out what kind of
> setup people are using in production.
> Thanks
> Kumar
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/riak-kv-memory-backend-in-production-tp4028393.html
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

When the cat is away, the mouse is alone.
- David Yu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20130719/34d24c1f/attachment.html>

More information about the riak-users mailing list