Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)

Siraaj Khandkar siraaj at khandkar.net
Mon Jul 22 19:52:45 EDT 2013

On 07/22/2013 10:29 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> You should be doing a GET before the PUT with the deletedvclock option.
> Here is an example I used to originally test (and fix) this bug:
> https://gist.github.com/Vagabond/965376#file-delete_bug-erl-L48
> Sadly, because of backwards compatability issues, it was not possible to
> default deletedvclock to be 'on'. Perhaps enough time has passed to
> revisit that now. All the client libraries should understand the
> message now.

Ah! This makes total sense now - how can there be a resolution without a 
vclock? There cannot.

Thank you for the fast help, guys!

More information about the riak-users mailing list