Dangling keys/objects after a batch of sequential inserts (for going on 3 days)
siraaj at khandkar.net
Mon Jul 22 19:52:45 EDT 2013
On 07/22/2013 10:29 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> You should be doing a GET before the PUT with the deletedvclock option.
> Here is an example I used to originally test (and fix) this bug:
> Sadly, because of backwards compatability issues, it was not possible to
> default deletedvclock to be 'on'. Perhaps enough time has passed to
> revisit that now. All the client libraries should understand the
> message now.
Ah! This makes total sense now - how can there be a resolution without a
vclock? There cannot.
Thank you for the fast help, guys!
More information about the riak-users