question about java client
paul at fanzo.me
Tue Jul 30 14:20:25 EDT 2013
Ok, thats perfect. I totally missed the annotation for links…
Will give that a shot…
Founder & CEO Fanzo
paul at fanzo.me
On Jul 30, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Brian Roach <roach at basho.com> wrote:
> I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking.
> If you do a fetch and have siblings each one is converted to your
> domain object using the Converter and then passed as a Collection to
> the ConflictResolver. Each sibling is going to include its links
> and/or indexes as long as the Converter is injecting them into the
> domain object and you can resolve them in the ConflictResolver.
> The default JSONConverter, for example, injects them into your domain
> object via annotations from the com.basho.riak.client.convert
> Brian Roach
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Paul Ingalls <paul at fanzo.me> wrote:
>> Newbie with Riak, and looking at the java client.
>> Specifically, I've been digging into the domain mapping apis. Looking into
>> the code, it appears to me that, if I'm using links a bunch or even
>> secondary indexes, that I could lose some data during the conflict
>> resolution phase. I see where links and other relevant user data gets
>> cached during the conversion phase from the fetch and then patched back in
>> during the conversion phase for the store. However, it doesn't look like
>> you have the opportunity during the resolution phase to merge metadata.
>> Should I focus on using the raw client, or am I missing something?
>> Paul Ingalls
>> Founder & CEO Fanzo
>> paul at fanzo.me
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users