benchmark results on my $75/month 5 node cluster :)

James Martin jmartin at
Thu Oct 3 10:46:34 EDT 2013


Nice work benchmarking!  One thing to keep in mind (and you probably
are well aware of this), particularly when benchmarking on cloud
platforms, is that there are a lot of factors that affect performance
outside  -- other tenants, blackbox hardware upgrades, changes in SLAs
-- just to name a few.  What you may see today in your benchmarks may
not be what you see tomorrow, or even in the next hour.  Some
providers do offer performance SLAs and/or guaranteed IOPs, and this
can help mitigate the problem, but doesn't necessarily remove it.

You might find this article interesting (although a bit dated):

- James

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Alex Rice <alex at> wrote:
> Hey, something that is impressive about Riak is how well it performs
> even on  super low end cloud virtualization (unlike for example,
> couchbase, which hardly runs at all unless you have quad cores per
> each node)
> Having so much fun benchmarking, it's really distracting me from coding!
> the cluster : 5 nodes on Windows Azure cloud
> Ubuntu 12.04, Riak 1.2.4
> node are xsmall vm (1 shared cpu core, 768 mb ram)
> The xmall vms are only $15/month and they are not recommended for
> "production". but in a 5 node riak cluster, it's really nothing to
> scoff at!
> I suspect the main bottleneck is not the cpu or disk, rather I think
> it's the each xsmall node is allowed only 5Mbit/sec on the ethernet.
> Here is a basho_bench graph, if anyone feels like viewing it
> note the basho bench was running on a quad core machine on the same
> vlan with 5 workers.
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at

More information about the riak-users mailing list