Read Before Writes on Distributed Counters
sean at basho.com
Thu Oct 17 11:22:58 EDT 2013
The reasons counters are interesting are:
1) You send an "increment" or "decrement" operation rather than the new
2) Any conflicts that were created by that operation get resolved
So, no, sibling explosion will not occur.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Daniil Churikov <ddosia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Correct me if I wrong, but when you blindly do update without previous
> you create a sibling, which should be resolved on read. In case if you make
> a lot of increments for counter and rarely reads it will lead to siblings
> I am not familiar with new counters datatypes, so I am curious.
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com>
Basho Technologies, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users