secondary indexes limit

Louis-Philippe Perron lpperron at gmail.com
Mon Oct 21 10:13:41 EDT 2013


I had heard from a possibly unfounded source that creating over 1000
different secondary indexes could place a burden on cluster performance.
 Can anyone confirm that?

L-P


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Alexander Sicular <siculars at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think that's just a memory limit.
>
> mo 2i mo problems.
>
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>
> Sent from my iRotaryPhone
>
> > On Oct 18, 2013, at 16:44, Louis-Philippe Perron <lpperron at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > this question has probably been answered already, still I can't get to
> it, so,
> >
> > What is the maximum number of unique secondary indexe keys a riak
> cluster can manage before running into trouble?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > L-P
> > _______________________________________________
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users at lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20131021/df2f25e3/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list