1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works?

Jared Morrow jared at basho.com
Mon Oct 21 10:42:22 EDT 2013


We actually discussed this recently, my understanding of reip was clearly
not complete, and Joe Caswell put me on the right track.  'reip' will
continue to stick around.

-Jared


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Dave Brady <dbrady at weborama.com> wrote:

> No problem, Jared!  I'm happy it was a very simple fix.
>
> What concerns me is that the 'cluster' commands do not have an analogous
> feature: 'replace' does not do the same thing as 'reip'.
>
> Is it truly a foregone conclusion that 'reip' is going away?
>
> --
> Dave Brady
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Jared Morrow" <jared at basho.com>
> *To: *"Dave Brady" <dbrady at weborama.com>
> *Cc: *"Riak Users Mailing List" <riak-users at lists.basho.com>
> *Sent: *Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 16:17:52
> *Subject: *Re: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works?
>
>
> This was a mistake on my part, if you s/up/down/ (node_down_check) on that
> line it will correctly ensure the node is down before running reip.  Sorry
> about that, clearly 'reip' is not heavily used with the new cluster
> commands and it slipped under the radar for all these months.
>
> -Jared
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Dave Brady <dbrady at weborama.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Joe Caswell at Basho: just have to comment out line 382
>> (node_up_check) in the riak-admin script.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Brady
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dave Brady" <dbrady at weborama.com>
>> To: riak-users at lists.basho.com
>> Sent: Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 13:59:37
>> Subject: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works?
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> So, I went to copy /var/lib/riak/* from one five-node cluster to another,
>> so that we could experiment on the data.
>>
>> I did this fairly frequently in the past (< 1.4.0), and always used
>> "riak-admin reip <old> <new>".
>>
>> Now, when I try that command on our 1.4.2 ring, 'riak-admin' dies with
>> "Node is not running!"
>>
>> This confuses me, since "reip" requires the ring to be down, but the
>> "riak-admin" script is indeed expecting the local node to be running when
>> using this option.
>>
>> I see on the wiki that it is mentioned that "cluster replace" will
>> replace "reip" in the future.  I hope not, since "cluster replace" does not
>> provide the same functionality.
>>
>> Anyone run into this and find a fix?  (Or I am missing something obvious?)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Dave Brady
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20131021/a3fe8050/attachment.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list