kota at basho.com
Wed Oct 30 00:00:50 EDT 2013
If the requests from the clients are not so frequent, there might be
another option, to emulate multiget by running mapreduce with keylist
input. This will make Riak run cover operation internally, so the
throughput won't improve but latency would improve, because it runs
inside the server in parallel. Hope this helps.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com> wrote:
> We will consider this for a future release of Riak. In the meantime, have
> you considered JRuby for your app? It has much better multi-threaded
> behavior than MRI.
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Vincent Chavelle
> <vincent.chavelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I fell in love with riak and riak-cs, I have migrated all my stack on it
>> (originally from mongodb).
>> But I have one big issue. I have a lot of key to request simultaneously
>> and thanks for multi_get implementation (ruby) it's already optimised for
>> the client side (concurrent requests). But I would like to know if any
>> server implementation to come because, in my case, it is very very slow to
>> request 1000 objects (unlike mongodb).
>> You will make me the happiest man in the world. And I could take off my
>> hideous memory caching solution :-)
>> Vincent Chavelle
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> Sean Cribbs <sean at basho.com>
> Software Engineer
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
Kota UENISHI / @kuenishi
Basho Japan KK
More information about the riak-users