multiple clusters on the same hosts
kthakore at scratchd.ca
Fri Jan 3 17:24:31 EST 2014
Vagrant (https://github.com/basho/vagrant-riak-cluster) will probably be
not so great for performance but you won't notice that until you need too
(map reduce will suck). Once your cluster needs grow, migrating your nodes
to physical boxes shouldn't be hard. Consider and uneven split on 2 boxes
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Patrick Tuckey <patrick.tuckey at gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks Kartik, I will check out docker/vagrant!
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kartik Thakore <kthakore at scratchd.ca>wrote:
>> Hey Patrick,
>> I have done this in the past. I would recommend using docker/vagrant to
>> separate each node on the clusters. Additionally us a different port scheme
>> for (8098 vs.s 9098) for each nodes.
>> The biggest problem I have had was sys admins accidentally merging
>> different clusters.
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Patrick Tuckey <patrick.tuckey at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> Has anyone had experience running multiple clusters on the same host(s)?
>>> We have two distinct data sets that we'd like to keep in riak, but one
>>> of them is more experimental, so we'd like to run them as separate
>>> clusters. That being said, it would be preferable to use the same hardware
>>> if we can.
>>> I see that it's described here in the docs:
>>> But was curious if there were any gotchas with running that in a
>>> production environment.
>>> riak-users mailing list
>>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the riak-users