Riak Search Pagination

Bryan Hunt admin at binarytemple.co.uk
Mon Dec 21 20:21:13 EST 2015


It would seem the order of recreation may be different to that of the original ingest. Isn't sorting best performed on the application server side  in order to reduce demands on cluster RAM anyway? When you migrated to the new cluster did you make any change to the storage configuration ?

  Original Message  
From: Garrido
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:09 AM
To: Bryan Hunt
Cc: riak-users at lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Riak Search Pagination

Solr (2.x), 
> On Dec 21, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Bryan Hunt <admin at binarytemple.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> In the context of Solr (2.x), legacy (1.4), or secondary indexes (2i) (1.x+)? 
> 
> 
> Original Message 
> From: Garrido
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 11:36 PM
> To: riak-users at lists.basho.com
> Subject: Riak Search Pagination
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> Recently we migrated our Riak nodes to another network, so we backup the data and then regenerate the ring, all is well, but there is a strange behaviour in a riak search, for example if we execute a query using the riak_erlang_client, returns the objects in the order:
> 
> A, B, C
> 
> And then if we execute again the same query the result is:
> 
> B, A, C, 
> 
> So, in other order, do you know what is causing this?, before to change our riak ring to another network, it was working perfectly.
> 
> Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com





More information about the riak-users mailing list