Data modelling questions
ams.fwd at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 13:24:10 EST 2015
On 2/22/15 6:16 PM, Jason Campbell wrote:
> Coming at this from another angle, if you already have a permanent data store, and you are only reporting on each hour at a time, can you run the reports based on the log itself?
> A lot of Riak’s advantage comes from the stability and availability of data storage, but S3 is already doing that for you. Riak can store the data, but I’m not sure what benefit it serves from my understanding of your problem.
> Aggregates are usually quite small (even with more advanced things like histograms), so it’s relatively easy to parse a log line-by-line and produce aggregates in-memory for a report.
> Can you give a bit more detail on why are you using Riak?
For the most part yes, we are using EMR at the moment, but some of the
reasons I want to go down that road are:
- We are not quite 'bit data' (using that definition that I can process
60 mins of my data on an 8 core 16G machine in under 40 mins) and EMR is
actually 'slower' for us, than just running it locally on a large
machine. That brings its own stability and maintenance issues for us. It
would be much nicer if the data was stored relliably and in a format
that was query-able quickly instead of having to reprocess things.
- The data is compressed and we actually waste quite a bit of time
decompressing it for EMR which is yet another issue if we have to
re-process due to single machine durability issues.
- We want to be able to drive graphs and alerts off of the data whose
granularity is most likely going to be of the order of 10 mins . These
are just counters on a single time dimension so I am assuming that if I
get the model right I will this will be easy. Yes we can do this via EMR
but it also requires additional moving parts that we would have to manage.
- We have certain BI use cases (as yet not clearly defined) that riak MR
would be quite useful and faster for us.
All in all Riak appears to offer the sweet spot of reliability, data
management and querying tools such that all we would have to be
concerned about is the the actual cluster itself.
> Hope this helps,
>> On 23 Feb 2015, at 13:03, AM <ams.fwd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jason, Christopher.
>> This is supposed to be an append-only time-limited data. I only intend to save about 2 weeks worth of data (which is yet another thing I need to figure out, ie how to vacate older data).
>> Re: querying, for the most part the system will be building out hourly reports based on geo, build and location information so I need to have a model that allows me to aggregate by timestamp + [each-of-geo-build-location] or just do it on the fly during ingestion.
>> Ingestion is yet another thing where I have some flexibility as it is a batch job, ie log files get dropped on S3 and we get notified (usually on an hourly basis, some logs on a 10-min basis) so I can massage it further but I am concerned that every place where I buffer is another opportunity for losing data and I would like to avoid reprocessing as much as possible.
>> Messages will already have the timestamp and msg-id and I will mostly be interested in aggregates. In some very rare cases I expect to be able to simply run map-reduce jobs for custom queries.
>> Given that, does my current model look reasonable?
>> On 2/21/15 6:40 PM, Jason Campbell wrote:
>>> I have the same questions as Christopher.
>>> Does this data need to change, or is it write-once?
>>> What information do you have when querying?
>>> - Will you already have timestamp and msg-id?
>>> - If not, you may want to consider aggregating everything into a single key. This is easier of the data isn’t changing.
>>> What data will you typically be querying?
>>> - Will you typically be looking for a single element of data, or aggregates (graphing or mapping for example)?
>>> - If aggregates, what fields are you aggregating on (timestamp, geo, location, etc) and which will be fixed?
>>> The aggregate question may need a little more explanation, so I will use an example.
>>> I have been working on time-series data with my key being: <node-id>:<metric-id>:<timestamp>
>>> Node-id and metric-id are fixed, they will never be merged in an aggregate way, and I have them before querying.
>>> Timestamp is my aggregate value, I may need a single timestamp, or hundreds of thousands of timestamps (to draw a graph). For this reason, I grouped my metrics by 5 minute block instead of one key per timestamp. I also created aggregates with relevant averages and such for 1 hour, 1 day and 1 month to reduce the amount of key lookups for large graphs.
>>> So it depends what visualisations you want. If you are going to be mapping the most recent data based on the geo or location, I would include aggregates for that. If you are more interested in timestamp, group by that. Because Riak doesn’t have multi-key consistency though, also choose an canonical source of data. If you store the same data in multiple keys, they will diverge at some point. Decide now which is the real source, and which are derived, it will make your life easier when fixing data later.
>>> Also keep in mind typical periods and data size. There was no point for me to create a 1 minute increment since the 5 minute data was an acceptable size. Sure it’s a waste to transmit 4 minutes of data I don’t need, but it’s measured in milliseconds (mainly unserialising JSON in my app), so it doesn’t matter to me and makes larger aggregates much more performant.
>>>> On 22 Feb 2015, at 03:44, Christopher Meiklejohn <cmeiklejohn at basho.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 5:35 PM, AM <ams.fwd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All.
>>>>> I am currently looking at using Riak as a data store for time series data. Currently we get about 1.5T of data in JSON format that I intend to persist in Riak. I am having some difficulty figuring out how to model it such that I can fulfill the use cases I have been handed.
>>>>> The data is provided in several types of log formats with some common fields:
>>>>> - timestamp
>>>>> - geo
>>>>> - s/w build #
>>>>> - location #
>>>>> - .... whole bunch of other key value pairs.
>>>>> For the most part I will need to provide aggregated views based on geo. There are some views based on s/w build # and location #. The aggregation will be on an hourly basis.
>>>>> The model that I came up with:
>>>>> <log-format-type>[<hour>][<timestamp>-<msg-id>]: <json-body>
>>>> Hi AM,
>>>> Additionally, it would be great if you could provide additional information on how you plan on querying both the original and aggregated values. Querying is usually the most difficult part to get right in Riak, and your query pattern will be very important in establishing the best way to lay out this data on disk.
>>>> - Chris
>>>> Christopher Meiklejohn
>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>> Basho Technologies, Inc.
>>>> cmeiklejohn at basho.com
>>>> riak-users mailing list
>>>> riak-users at lists.basho.com
More information about the riak-users