Reliability quastion

Joshua Muzaaya joshmuza at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 03:30:28 EST 2016


I suggest u test out CouchBase or Cloudant or CouchDB as well. Riak can be
problematic when things go wrong.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Russell Brown <russell.brown at me.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 14 Jan 2016, at 07:05, j.halifax2 at seznam.cz wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I am a member of the community for about a year to understand reliability
> of Riak.
>
> What I can see here is that there are some problems which could prevent
> using
>
> it in a project which require high reliability. That's why I'd like to ask
> the following:
>
>
> Do you believe that Riak can be used in a project which requires high
> reliability?
>
> Yes!
>
>
> Thank you so much..
>
>
> BR,
>
> jh
>
>
>
> =
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users at lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20160114/9284d49a/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the riak-users mailing list